State v. Knittel’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2018
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bell v. Burson · United States v. Jorn · United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co. · United States v. Wilson · Illinois v. Vitale
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[W]e do believe that notice of an opportunity for a hearing sent by regular mail is insufficient to guarantee due process when the presumption of receipt raised by Section 31-11-03(24), N.D.C.C., is rebutted.” 308 N.W.2d at 384 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Where a statute is subject to two possible constructions, one which is of doubtful constitutionality and one which is not, the latter must be adopted. State v. Howe, 247 N.W.2d 647 (N.D.1976). Accordingly, we construe the statute to require more than constructive notice. St ate v. Knittel, 308 N.W.2d 379, 383 (N.D.1981). . We are referred to § 12.1-01-03 for the effect of presumptions in criminal cases by the Explanatory Note to the omitted rule on”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tininenko
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.