Webber v. Webber’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
October 1989
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 8914
Relies on McCarty v. McCarty · Nastrom v. Nastrom · Lapp v. Lapp · Williams v. Williams · Eberhart v. Eberhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Though the McCarty case arose in California, a community property state, it is clear that the law of property division in states like North Dakota are affected as well.” 308 N.W.2d at 549 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rust v. Rust
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.