SAIF Corp. v. Stephen’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
September 1994
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] person who voluntarily withdraws from the work force is not entitled to [permanent total disability] benefits . . . because she or he is no longer a worker”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.