¶1Appellant’s arguments on appeal are without merit. However, it appears the sentencing of sixty days in jail, with thirty days thereof suspended, followed by two years probation was contrary to Fla.Stat. § 948.01(4) (1973). Consequently, the cause is hereby remanded for resentencing in accordance with the rationale of Hults v. State, Fla.App .2d, 1975, 307 So.2d 489.
308 So. 2d 51
Harrell v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 14, 1975
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1975-02-14
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1976
2 state decisions
Applies FL 948 § 948.01
Relies on 307 So. 2d 489 - Hults v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1975-02-14
View the full empirical analysis of this case →