308 So. 2d 780 - State v. Junell’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

13 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"When a person submits to a blood test at the request of a law enforcement officer under the provisions of R.S. 32:662, only a physician, registered nurse, qualified technician or chemist may withdraw blood for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content therein. This limitation shall not apply to the taking of breath specimens."”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Skeetoe · 458 So. 2d 1347 - State v. Carlisle

2. “LSA-R.S. 32:663 provides as follows: Chemical analysis of the person's blood, urine, breath or other bodily substance, to be considered valid under the provisions of this part, should have been performed according to methods approved by the Department of Public Safety and by an individual possessing a valid permit issued by said department for this purpose. The Department of Public Safety is authorized to approve satisfactory techniques or methods, to ascertain the qualification and competence of individuals to conduct such analysis, and to issue permits which shall be subject to termination or revocation at the discretion of the department.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 478 So. 2d 673 - State v. Fortner

3. “* * * to provide motorists who are deemed to have consented to such tests with the protection of the right to know that * * * the procedure used [in the analysis of his blood, breath, urine or other bodily secretion] complies with the minimum standards set by the department of health.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 316 So. 2d 100 - State v. Jones