308 So. 2d 921 - Worthy v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 1988
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Grillis v. State · 260 So. 2d 436 - Johnson v. State · 301 So. 2d 853 - Applegate v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any person who has not reached his twenty-first (21st) birthday and who is convicted of a first offense under subsections (a), (b), or (c) of section 41-29-139, shall, or of a second or subsequent offense under subsections (d) or (e) of section 41-29-139, in the discretion of the court, may be confined under the terms set out in subsection (c) above for all or any portion of the sentence imposed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burns v. State“when there is substantial doubt as to which of the two (statutes) is to be applied,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burns v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.