Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 308 U.S. 422 - General American Tank Car Corporation v. El Dorado Terminal Co

General American Tank Car Corporation v. El Dorado Terminal Co’s Empirical Analysis

308 U.S. 422 · 1940

Citation profile

564
cited by 564 later decisions
64
cited 64 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

196 federal appellate · 48 district · 64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 564 later decisions (64 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2023 · most notably United States v. Western Pacific Railroad (1956), United States v. Philadelphia National Bank (1963)

196 federal appellate · 48 district · 64 state decisions — followed in 16 states

1170194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedEl Dorado Terminal Co. v. General American Tank Car Corp. (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co. · Mitchell Coal Coke Company v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company · Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Puritan Coal Mining Company · Ellis v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 564 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When it appeared in the course of the litigation that an administrative problem, committed to the Commission, was involved, the court should have stayed its hand pending the Commission's determination of the lawfulness and reasonableness of the practices under the terms of the Act.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Commission may, after hearing, on a complaint or upon its own initiative without complaint, establish reasonable rules, regulations, and practices with respect to car service by common carriers by railroad subject to this chapter, including the compensation to be paid . . . for the use of any locomotive, car, or other vehicle not owned by the carrier using it (and whether or not owned by another carrier), and the penalties or other sanctions for nonobservance of such rules, regulations, or practices.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “entitled, under the plain terms of § 15(13), to be paid by the carrier a just and reasonable allowance . . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.