Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 309 A2D 324 - State v. Vickers

State v. Vickers’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
6
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2014

19 state decisions

8019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Malloy v. Hogan · Kastigar v. United States · Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor · Shillitani v. United States · Ullmann v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[t]he essential ingredient of a civil contempt sanction is that the contemnor is given the opportunity to purge himself of his contempt, and such is the case when no determinate sentence is imposed or when the determinate sentence imposed is made on condition that the contemnor be released if he be willing to [comply with the court’s order].” Id., at 328 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he constitutional privilege against self-incrimination protects against any disclosures which the witness reasonably believes could be used in a criminal prosecution or could lead to other evidence that might be so used. State v. Vickers, Me., 309 A.2d 324, 327 (1973).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““could not be used, directly or indirectly, in any future criminal prosecution in any court of the land, state or federal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.