Fox v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 1996
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Evitts v. Lucey · Pennsylvania v. Finley · 27 Ark. App. 198 - Lee v. State · Maulding v. State · Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not an unreasonable restriction on an appellant for post-conviction relief to require that in those instances where a petitioner pleaded guilty while Rule 37 was not in effect and the petitioner was not advised of the provisions of Rule 36.4, petitions under Rule 37 will not be considered timely unless the petition was filed within ninety days of the date of the reinstatement of Rule 37. (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cherry v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.