Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

309 F.2d 232

Docket No. 16973.

Dreos v. Sitnick

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Oct. 18, 1962.

Decided Oct. 18, 1962.

Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied En Banc Nov. 20, 1962.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1962-10-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1962

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1962-10-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1George C. Dreos, appellant pro se.

¶2Joseph Sitnick, Washington, D. C., with whom Joseph B. Calandriello, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for ap-pellees.

¶3Before Bastían, Burger and Wright, Circuit Judges.

¶4*233PER CURIAM.

¶5This is a paid appeal from a judgment of the District Court dismissing appellant’s complaint in a libel suit.

¶6On the record before us, the appeal should be dismissed as frivolous, and an order to that end will be entered.

¶7Appeal dismissed as frivolous.

/309/f2d/232 · .json · Public domain