Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

309 F.2d 850

Docket No. 13925.

United States v. Self

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Oct. 29, 1962.

Decided Nov. 20, 1962.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1962-11-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1962

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Wentz

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1962-11-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Pearse O’Connor, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

¶2Gustave Diamond, Asst. U. S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa. (Joseph S. Ammerman, U. S. Atty., Western District of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

¶3Before STALEY, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This appeal is from a judgment of conviction1 on the third and fifth counts of an indictment which charged the appellant with violations of Section 472 of Title 18 U.S.C., to wit, the passing of counterfeited obligations of the United States with intent to defraud. The appellant here argues, as he did in the court below in support of a motion for acquittal, that the evidence was insufficient to support the allegation that the obligations were counterfeit. We have reviewed the record and find that the argument is clearly without merit; the spuriousness of the obligations was amply established by competent evidence.

¶6The judgment of the court will be affirmed.

/309/f2d/850 · .json · Public domain