United States v. Algee’s Empirical Analysis
309 F.3d 1011 · 2002
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
February 2018
most recently cited
15 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · United States v. Olano · Wheat v. United States · United States v. Leichtnam · United States v. Heidecke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Count 3 of the superseding indictment charged Algee with knowingly possessing, after having previously been convicted of a felony, a firearm, “that is a Norinco, model SKS, 7.62 caliber, semiautomatic rifle, and a Harrington and Richardson, model “Victor,’ .22 caliber revolver.” At trial, however, evidence of five firearms, including the two listed in the superseding indictment, were introduced. Further, the jury was instructed that it had to conclude only that Algee “knowingly possessed a firearm” to find him guilty on the count.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“ethical constraints would prohibit [counsel] from cross-examining [witnesses] in any meaningful way”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Doe v. Nielsen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.