Mudd v. White’s Empirical Analysis
309 F.3d 819 · 2002
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Bennett v. Spear · Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn. · Quirin Haupt Kerling Burger Heinck Thiel Neubauer United States Quirin v. Cox Usa 6
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“appellant[s] must show that [their] asserted interest is among the group of claims that is envisioned by the relevant statute.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“actual or imminent, not `conjectural' or `hypothetical.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[They] fail[] this test if [their] interests are so marginally related to or inconsistent with the implicit purposes in the statute `that it cannot reasonably be assumed that Congress intended to permit the suit.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.