309 F. Supp. 2d 1 - Bublitz v. Brownlee’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
9 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 14507 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 28 U.S.C. § 1631 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Bowen v. Massachusetts · United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe · Joseph Beers v. The State of Arkansas · Jaffee v. United States · Nichols v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the APA, a plaintiff may sue the United States 'in the district courts for remedies other than money damages arising from an agency's unlawful action.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.