Newdow v. Eagen’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 2 U.S.C. § 61D · 2 U.S.C. § 84
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“threat of future stigmatic injury is too speculative to qualify as an injury in fact”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Barker v. Conroy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.