Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 309 FSUPP3D 1048 - Fish v. Kobach

Fish v. Kobach’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
February 2019
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 52 U.S.C. § 20504 · 52 U.S.C. § 20507 · 52 U.S.C. § 20509 · 8 U.S.C. § 1373 (§ 642 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996)

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Anderson v. Celebrezze · Burdick v. Takushi · Norman v. Reed Cook County Officers Electoral Board · Crawford v. Marion County Election Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Richman and a graduate student assistant went through the suspense list and determined which names were, in their view, foreign. Neither Dr. Richman nor his assistant had any experience in identifying so-called foreign names. By his own admission, their determinations were subjective and based primarily on whether the name was 'anglophone,' meaning originating in the British Isles. Dr. Richman also testified that their work was performed quickly, and that they made many mistakes along the way. A review of their coding revealed inconsistencies; for example, of five individuals with the last name of 'Lopez,' two were coded as foreign and three were coded as non-foreign. On cross examination, Dr. Richman admitted that he would have coded Carlos Murguia, a United States District Judge sitting in this Court, as foreign.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “pattern and practice ... of flaunting disclosure and discovery rules”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.