Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 309 FSUPP3D 407 - Hately v. Watts

Hately v. Watts’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2701 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2704 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2707 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Carter v. Ball · Goldberg v. B. Green & Co. · 154 F. Supp. 2d 497 - In Re DoubleClick Inc. Privacy Litigation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may include in its subpoena or court order [requesting communications stored by a remote computing service] a requirement that the service provider to whom the request is directed create a backup copy of the contents of the electronic communications sought in order to preserve the communications.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[O]nce an email has been delivered and opened, its transmission is complete, the [electronic communication service] is no longer storing it 'incident to transmission.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “'[S]uch communication' in § 2510(17)(B) refers to communication 'temporar[ily and] intermediate[ly]' stored 'incidental to the electronic transmission thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.