State v. Doelz’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

24 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Reviewing a district court's decision on a motion to suppress requires the application of a bifurcated standard. The appellate court reviews the district court's factual findings to determine whether they are supported by substantial competent evidence, and then the ultimate legal conclusion is reviewed using a de novo standard. In reviewing the factual findings, the appellate court does not reweigh the evidence or assess the credibility of witnesses. 'Substantial competent evidence is such legal and relevant evidence as a reasonable person might accept as being sufficient to support a conclusion.' [Citations omitted.]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Scheuerman

2. “'Investigatory detentions are generally permitted under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and K.S.A. 22-2402 if "an objective officer would have a reasonable and articulable suspicion that the detainee committed, is about to commit, or is committing a crime.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Bates

3. “The automobile exception provides that a warrant is not required to search a vehicle as long as 'probable cause exists to believe the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime' and the vehicle is 'readily mobile.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Crudo