Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 309 Kan. 379 - State v. Woodring

State v. Woodring’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ward · State v. Edgar · In the Matter of Jensen · State v. Betancourt · State v. Aguilar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Judicial discretion is abused if judicial action (1) is arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable, i.e., if no reasonable person would have taken the view adopted by the trial court; (2) is based on an error of law, i.e., if the discretion is guided by an erroneous legal 11 conclusion; or (3) is based on an error of fact, i.e., if substantial competent evidence does not support a factual finding on which a prerequisite conclusion of law or the exercise of discretion is based.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the defendant of the consequences of the plea, including the specific sentencing guidelines level of any crime committed . . . and of the maximum penalty provided by law which may be imposed upon acceptance of such plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.