Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 309 Kan. 401 - State v. Blansett

State v. Blansett’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · State v. Ward · Comfort v. California · Washington v. Louisiana · State v. Stone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'fall outside the wide latitude afforded prosecutors to conduct the State's case.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]hen the defense creates an inference that the State's evidence is not credible because the State failed to admit a certain piece of evidence, the State may rebut the inference by informing the jury that the defense has the power to introduce evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that the State refused to call a witness beneficial to the defense”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.