State v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “When considering whether a new trial is warranted based on juror misconduct, the trial court first considers whether there was a fundamental failure in the proceeding. If a fundamental failure did occur, the trial court moves to the second step and considers whether the party benefitting from the failure has shown the trial can continue without an injustice, meaning the party has shown beyond a reasonable doubt that the failure did not affect the outcome of the trial. An appellate court reviews the trial court's decision in two parts. It reviews the conclusion on whether a fundamental failure occurred for an abuse of discretion. As for the second question—whether any failure resulted in injustice—an appellate court does not review the district court's decision for abuse of discretion but 27 considers the entire record and performs its own constitutional harmless error review.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. – State v. Pruitt –

2. “Therefore, a sentencing court has no authority to order a term of postrelease supervision in conjunction with an off-grid indeterminate life sentence.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Fraire