People v. Lowenstein’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on People v. Morris · People v. Kolowich · In re Franklin on Habeas Corpus · People v. Powers · People v. Van Den Dreissche
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The two counts did not charge inconsistent offenses. Both arose out of the same transaction, both were provable by the same testimony, only one time, place and subject being involved.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Ormsby“result in conviction for two felonies such as to subject the defendant to additional punishment under the habitual criminal act”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Gardner“the fact that defendant was convicted and sentenced on both counts”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Gardner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.