State v. Bare’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2004
1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Taylor · State v. Williams · State v. Avery · State v. Johnson · State v. Bock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Q. Well sir, isn’t it true in order to get into the program, if Mr. Ashburn is the man who did it, whoever is in charge, have to first tell the government they will not be indicted for the crime [sic] which he was involved? A. No sir, that is incorrect, he could be put in the program if in fact at a later time he was going to be indicted. Q. Is it-your testimony that no promise of immunity of any type have [sic] been given to Mr. Vines? A. That’s correct. Q. And you discussed that with Mr. Ashburn and Mr. Wad-dell? A. That’s correct. Q. And if any of the parties wanted to, who had the power and authority they could indict Mr. Vines at this time? A. It’s my understanding he could be indicted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Vines“Q. Have you ever been promised anything else other than the Witness Protection Program for testimony you are giving here and participation in this case? A. No sir I have not even been promised to [sic] put on Witness Protection; the case is still in Washington and still deciding if they are going to put me under witness protection. Not been promised anything by Mr. Chapman, Ashburn or anything else. Q. So far as you know if they wanted to charge you today they could? A. Yes sir. Q. But they never said they wouldn’t charge you, is that correct? A. No sir, they didn’t tell me they would not.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Vines“gave the jury an extensive instruction on evaluating the credibility of interested witnesses and in so doing referred to [the witness] specifically . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.