Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 309 N.C. 231 - State v. Heptinstall

State v. Heptinstall’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably State v. Avery (1985), State v. Thompson (1991)

43 state decisions

1601983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pate v. Robinson · Drope v. Missouri · Public Broadcasting Service v. Network Project · Mark Trail Camp Grounds, Inc. v. Field Enterprises, Inc. · State v. Propst

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is the [trial] court's duty to resolve conflicts in the evidence”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) The question of the capacity of the defendant to proceed may be raised at any time on motion by the prosecutor, the defendant, the defense counsel, or the court. The motion shall detail the specific conduct that leads the moving party to question the defendant’s capacity to proceed. (b) When the capacity of the defendant to proceed is questioned, the court shall hold a hearing to determine the defendant’s capacity to proceed. If an examination is ordered . . ., the hearing shall be held after the examination. Reasonable notice shall be given to the defendant and prosecutor, and the State and the defendant may introduce evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “No person may be tried, convicted, sentenced, or punished for a crime when by reason of mental illness or defect he is unable to understand the nature and object of the proceedings against him, to comprehend his own situation in reference to the proceedings, or to assist in his defense in a rational or reasonable manner.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.