Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 309 N.C. 512 - State v. Lang

State v. Lang’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

100 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably State v. Golphin (2000), State v. Zuniga (1987)

100 state decisions

3401983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Edwards v. Arizona · Oregon v. Bradshaw · Hankerson v. North Carolina · State v. Wilkerson · State v. Hankerson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The general rule is that, at the close of a voir dire hearing to determine the admissibility of a defendant's confession, the presiding judge should make findings of fact to show the basis of his ruling.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]ny act evidencing “wickedness of disposition, hardness of heart, cruelty, recklessness of consequences, and a mind regardless of social duty and deliberately bent on mischief, though there may be no intention to injure a particular person” is sufficient to supply the malice necessary for second degree murder. ... An act that indicates a total disregard for human life is sufficient to supply the malice necessary to support the crime of second degree murder.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]hen there is a material conflict in the evidence on voir dire, the judge must make findings of fact resolving any such material conflict.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.