Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

309 N.C. 626

State v. Callicutt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1983

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1983-11-03

Relies on State v. Thompson

Decided 1983-11-03

PER CURIAM.

¶1The Court of Appeals determined that the trial court erred in the sentencing phase of the defendant’s trial and remanded for resentencing. Following a hearing pursuant to the Fair Sentencing Act, the trial court found as one of the aggravating factors that the defendant had a prior conviction for a criminal offense punishable by more than sixty days confinement. The Court of Appeals held that this aggravating factor may not be considered until the State presents evidence as to whether the defendant was indigent at the time of this prior conviction and if so, whether he was represented by counsel.

¶2This holding is erroneous in light of our decision in State v. Thompson, 309 N.C. 421, 307 S.E. 2d 156 (1983). There we held that the State does not have the burden “to raise and prove nonindigency and representation by counsel or waiver of counsel in order to support a finding that the defendant had a prior conviction or convictions.”

¶3The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to that court with instructions that it enter an order affirming the order of the trial court.

¶4Reversed and remanded.

/309/nc/626 · .json · Public domain