State v. Abdullah’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
72
cited by 72 later decisions
2
states following
May 1998
most recently cited
72 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bowsher v. Merck & Co. · State v. Johnson · State v. Covington · State v. Oliver · State v. Joyner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) defendant induced others to participate in the commission of the offense or occupied a portion of leadership or dominance of other participants; (2) the offense was committed for hire or pecuniary gain; and (3) the defendant had a prior conviction or convictions for criminal offenses punishable by more than 60 days confinement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“By this language it seems clear that it is not the use of evidence which is merely “inherent in the offense” but the use of evidence necessary to prove an element of the offense which is proscribed. [Emphasis in original.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kuplen“An Act To Clarify The Aggravating Factor Regarding Pecuniary Gain Under The Fair Sentencing Act”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Chandler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.