Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 309 NW2D 156 - State v. Ransom

State v. Ransom’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2010

6 state decisions

401981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Peterson · State v. Snethen · Lessenhop v. Norton · State v. Wallin · State v. Hitchens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The person making an arrest must inform the person to be arrested of the intention to arrest the person, the reason for arrest, and that the person making the arrest is a peace officer, if such be the case, and require the person being arrested to submit to the person’s custody....”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]rrest is the taking of a person into custody when and in the manner authorized by law, including restraint of the person or the person's submission to custody.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.