Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 309 NW2D 818 - Hunt v. Hunt

Hunt v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
8
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably Pickering v. Pickering (1989), Daugaard v. Baltic Cooperative Building Supply Ass'n (1984)

5 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

1301981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fadgen v. Lenkner · Morey v. Keller · Bigley v. Unity Auto Parts, Inc. · Pearsall v. Colgan · Bearbower v. Merry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While I agree that criminal conversation should be abolished, I am convinced that the tort of alienation of affections should be preserved until repealed by legislative action. It is one thing to abolish an action in tort which is devoid of defenses and unjust. It is quite another to abolish a long-standing legislative and judicial intention to preserve the sanctity of marriage by providing a civil remedy, and where reasonable and just defenses are available to a defendant. ... I feel certain that a case will arise in the future where some party has so flagrantly broken up a stable marriage that we would rue the day that an alienation suit was not available to the injured party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.