State v. Moen’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 59 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Workman v. Bredesen (2007), State v. Smith (1990)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 59 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hullum v. United States · United States v. Iron Shell · Roberts v. Hollocher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[s]tatements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain or sensations, or the inception or general character of the cause of [sic] external source thereof insofar as reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[e]vidence that shows a hostile relationship existed between a defendant and his victim tends to shed light on a defendant's mens rea " and is pertinent in a murder case, given that "[t]he state ha[s] the burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant's acts were intentional.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Although not offered by the state as an excited utterance, the statement * * * also would qualify for admission under * * * an exception to the hearsay rule for statements by a person laboring under the stress of an event that caused excitement."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nielsen · State v. Carlson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.