In Re Tidwell’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2019
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 32 Okla. Crim. 217 - Ex Parte Grant · 41 Cal. App. 2d 445 - People v. Rose · 75 Okla. Crim. 155 - Ex Parte Nye · 73 Okla. Crim. 32 - Ex Parte Glen Wilkerson · 88 Okla. Crim. 235 - Ex Parte Swain
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is no statute in Oklahoma requiring the trial court to give credit for time spent in custody prior to trial,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“in the absence of statute the time that the defendant has spent in jail awaiting trial forms no part of the time for which he was sentenced.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“in the absence of statute the convict is not entitled as a matter of absolute right to credit for the time spent in prison awaiting trial”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holloway v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.