Thacker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 595
Relies on McNabb v. United States · 77 Okla. Crim. 197 - Lyons v. State · People v. Vinci · 78 Okla. Crim. 299 - Fry v. State · 93 Okla. Crim. 379 - Hendrickson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An application for continuance on account of the absence of an alleged material witness is addressed to the sound discretion of a trial court and unless an abuse of discretion is shown the judgment will not be reversed.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State · Baeza v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.