309 Pa.
Volume 309 — Pennsylvania State Reports
106 opinions
- 309 Pa. 1Phillips v. American Liability & Surety Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 12Jackson v. Connelly (1932)
- 309 Pa. 17Muehlhof v. Reading Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 23Lerch's Estate (1932)
- 309 Pa. 30Brolasky's Estate (1932)
- 309 Pa. 44Commonwealth v. Eastern Securities Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 52Commonwealth v. Stegmaier Brewing Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 58Lindenmuth v. Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 71Cara v. Newark Fire Ins. Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 73Scranton Electric Co. v. Old Forge Boro. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 79Bosak State Bank v. Old Forge Boro. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 81Eyer v. Old Forge Borough (1932)
- 309 Pa. 83Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Old Forge Boro. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 84Philadelphia Rural Transit Co. v. Philadelphia (1932)
- 309 Pa. 98McCracken v. Curwensville Borough (1932)
- 309 Pa. 115Katz v. Katz (1932)
- 309 Pa. 122Koontz v. Baltimore Ohio R. R. Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 130Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Suburban Water Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 151Dorrance's Estate (1932)
- 309 Pa. 183Hoffman v. Johnstown & Somerset Railway Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 184Swaney v. Georges Township School District (1932)
- 309 Pa. 186Franklin Trust Co. v. Franklin Valveless Engine Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 188Riker v. Kilinski (1932)
- 309 Pa. 191Johnson v. McIntyre (1932)
- 309 Pa. 197Jamieson v. Pittsburgh Railways Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 200Finley's Estate (1932)
- 309 Pa. 204Stewart's Estate (1932)
- 309 Pa. 211Kaczynski v. Pittsburgh (1932)
- 309 Pa. 213Villiger v. Yellow Cab Co. of Pbg. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 216Miller & Sons' Co. v. Mt. Lebanon Township (1932)
- 309 Pa. 221H. Miller & Sons' Co. v. Mt. Lebanon Township (1932)
- 309 Pa. 224Ketchum v. Conneaut Lake Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 234Krenitsky v. Kelly (1932)
- 309 Pa. 236Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 240Orth v. Doench (1932)
- 309 Pa. 243Barton v. Franklin (1932)
- 309 Pa. 247Flinn v. 339 Fifth Avenue Land Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 249Catalano's Estate (1932)
- 309 Pa. 251Riefer v. Niehl Transportation Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 253Automobile Guarantee Corp. v. Leech (1932)
- 309 Pa. 256Dickinson v. Jones (1932)
- 309 Pa. 263Commonwealth v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 266White Et Ux. v. MacOubray (1932)
- 309 Pa. 268Kovacevich's Estate (1932)
- 309 Pa. 270Ringer v. Winner (1932)
- 309 Pa. 275Baldwin v. American Motor Sales Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 280Baldwin v. Stirling Bros. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 281Hornak v. Hornak (1932)
- 309 Pa. 283Gordish v. Steffinina (1932)
- 309 Pa. 285Arnold v. Stewart (1932)
- 309 Pa. 287Ellis v. Atlantic Refining Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 290Weiss v. Pittsburgh Railways Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 291Everson's Estate (1932)
- 309 Pa. 293Robertson v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 296Bassett v. Armstrong (1932)
- 309 Pa. 300Waychoff v. Waychoff (1932)
- 309 Pa. 309Roney's Estate (1932)
- 309 Pa. 314Pittsburgh Union Stock Yards Co. v. Pittsburgh Joint Stock Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 320Klein Et Ux. v. F. W. Woolworth Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 323Commonwealth Ex Rel. Directors of Poor v. Gibson (1932)
- 309 Pa. 327East Lake Road and Payne Ave. (1932)
<p>Where a statutory lien is proposed to be placed upon the property of defendant, every requirement of the statute must be strictly complied with, otherwise the whole proceeding is void: Scranton Sewer, 213 Pa. 4; Wilson v. Allegheny, 79 Pa. 272; Hershberger v. Pittsburgh, 115 Pa. 78; Meadville v. Dickson, 129 Pa. 7; Morewood Ave., 159 Pa. 39; Waynesburg v. Ray, 59 Pa. Superior Ct. 640.</p>
- 309 Pa. 331Tauber v. Wilkinsburg (1932)
- 309 Pa. 336Toncich v. Home Life Insurance Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 340Pearson Mfg. Co. v. Pittsburgh Steamboat Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 347Leahey v. Leahey (1932)
- 309 Pa. 357Franklin Street Methodist Episcopal Church v. Crystal Oil & Gas Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 365Fornelli v. Penna. R. R. Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 370McClure's Estate (1932)
- 309 Pa. 377Quattrochi v. Pittsburgh Railways Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 381Wilkerson v. Pittsburgh Railways Co. (1932)
The fact that the truck driver was negligent did not relieve the defendant if the motorman of the street car was also negligent: Gorman v. Charlson, 287 Pa. 410.
- 309 Pa. 385Swaney v. Georges Township Road District (1932)
- 309 Pa. 389Roberts's Estate (1932)
- 309 Pa. 393D. N. Corporation v. Roudabush (1932)
Appellee’s bid was fraudulent, misleading and not in compliance with the plans and specifications. The city cannot waive the requirements of the specifications: Pearlman v. Pittsburgh, 304 Pa. 24.
- 309 Pa. 400D. N. Corporation v. McCloskey (1932)
- 309 Pa. 402Wingert v. Anderson (1932)
- 309 Pa. 405Williamsport Poor District v. Lycoming Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 411Eichleay, Jr., Co. v. Antonoplos (1932)
- 309 Pa. 418Cross's Estate (1932)
- 309 Pa. 423Black, Exrs. v. Hoffman (1932)
- 309 Pa. 425Edgeworth Water Co. v. Sewickley Boro. (1932)
No certificate of public convenience is necessary for the mere use of existing facilities: Barnes Laundry Co. v. Pittsburgh, 266 Pa. 24. The Act of 1873 is constitutional: Sloan v. Klein, 230 Pa. 132; Reeves v. Water Co., 287 Pa. 376; State Line, etc., R. R. Co.’s App., 77 Pa. 429.
- 309 Pa. 434Bonar Land Company's Appeal (1932)
- 309 Pa. 439Kish v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 447Commonwealth Ex Rel. Miller v. Sommer (1932)
- 309 Pa. 450Medvidovich v. Schultz (1932)
The question of whether there existed facts to constitute constructive notice to defendant of the existence of a dangerous condition on his property must be determined by the jury.
- 309 Pa. 453Gordon v. S. M. Byers Motor Car Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 460Hempfield Township School District v. Cavalier (1932)
- 309 Pa. 470Union Trust Co. v. Long (1932)
- 309 Pa. 479Minella v. Penna. R. R. Co., (No. 1) (1932)
- 309 Pa. 486Commonwealth v. Lehman (1932)
- 309 Pa. 486Minella Et Ux. v. Penna. R. R. Co., (No. 2) (1932)
- 309 Pa. 501Com. v. Gilida, Alias Gallagher (1932)
- 309 Pa. 505Elwood's Estate (1932)
- 309 Pa. 510Commonwealth Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Beamish (1932)
- 309 Pa. 515Commonwealth v. Brown (1932)
- 309 Pa. 529Commonwealth v. Williams (1932)
- 309 Pa. 539Will (Nat. News Co.) v. Press Pub. Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 545Constitutional Defense League v. Waters (1932)
- 309 Pa. 551Wand v. Blum (1932)
- 309 Pa. 553Roth v. Freeborn (1932)
- 309 Pa. 556Reed's Appeal (1932)
- 309 Pa. 558Hoffner Et Ux. v. Bergdoll (1932)
- 309 Pa. 566Downing Exr. v. Felheim Exrs. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 574Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co. (1932)
- 309 Pa. 581Myers's Estate (1932)
- 309 Pa. 586Holbrook v. Wilkes-Barre (1932)
- 309 Pa. 590Mulholland v. Sterling Motor Truck Co. (1932)