Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

309 S.C. 94

In re Smith

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 24, 1992

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1992-07-24

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-07-24

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 2015

20 state decisions

120199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline petitions this Court to temporarily suspend the respondent from the practice of law. After a hearing in the matter, we have determined that the petition should be granted.

¶3IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this State is temporarily suspended until further order of this Court. Respondent shall, within fifteen (15) days of this order, file an affidavit with the Clerk of this Court showing that he has fully complied with the provisions of Paragraph 30 of Rule 413, SCACR. This order shall be made public as provided by Paragraph 7 B of Rule 413, SCACR.

/s/ Ernest A. Finnev. Jr.. C.J./s/Jean H. Toal. A.J.Is/ James E. Moore. A.J.Harwell, C.J., and Chandler, J., not participating.
/309/sc/94 · .json · Public domain