Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

309 So. 2d 43

Deal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1975-03-10

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1988

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1975-03-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant seeks reversal of the order denying his motion to vacate judgment and sentence entered for the offense of robbery.

¶2We have carefully examined the record-on-appeal and the briefs submitted by the parties. Upon our consideration thereof, we find that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the proceedings below, and the order appealed herein is accordingly

¶3Affirmed.

JOHNSON, Acting C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.
/309/so2d/43 · .json · Public domain