Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

309 So. 2d 56

Gomez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 19, 1975

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1975-02-19

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1991

3 state decisions

Relies on 301 So. 2d 7 - State v. Barber · 308 So. 2d 38 - Johnson v. State · Johnson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1975-02-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant Gomez was convicted of aggravated assault and sentenced to three years in the state prison.

¶2*57On appeal appellant first questions the sufficiency of the evidence. However, the sufficiency of evidence was not raised for an appellate court to review, appellant having failed to file either a motion for directed verdict or a motion for new trial. State v. Barber, Fla.1974, 301 So.2d 7.

¶3Appellant next contends that the trial court erred in not instructing the jury as to the penalty fixed by law for the offense charged as required by Rule 3.-390(a) RCrP. Said rule is not mandatory, only directory. Johnson v. State, Fla. 1974, 308 So.2d 38, affirming the view of this court expressed in Johnson v. State, 297 So.2d 35.

¶4Affirmed.

McNULTY, C. J., and HOBSON and GRIMES, JJ., concur.
/309/so2d/56 · .json · Public domain