Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 309 SW3D 135 - Barry v. Jackson

Barry v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 353rd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on City of Keller v. Wilson · Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc. · Cain v. Bain · Pool v. Ford Motor Co. · Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “presented ample evidence that they entered into the Pebble Garden contract due to Barry’s signing of the contract and that they were forced to break the contract, losing $3,889 in inspection fees, option fees, and earnest money, when Barry informed them that he was breaching his contract too late for them to cancel the Pebble Garden contract without penalty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.