Chadwick v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin))
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · Dusky v. United States · Godinez v. Moran · Guzman v. State · Indiana v. Edwards
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Constitution permits judges to take realistic account of. the particular defendant’s mental capacities by asking whether a defendant who' seeks to conduct his own defense at trial is mentally competent to do so. That is to say the Constitution permits States to insist upon representation by counsel for those competent enough to stand trial under Dusky [v. United States, 36[2] U.S. 402[, 80 S.Ct. 788 , 4 L.Ed.2d 824 ] (1960),] but who still suffer from severe mental illness to the point where they are not competent to conduct trial proceedings by themselves.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lewis v. State · Long v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.