Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 309 SW3D 558 - Chadwick v. State

Chadwick v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin))

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Dusky v. United States · Godinez v. Moran · Guzman v. State · Indiana v. Edwards

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he Constitution permits judges to take realistic account of. the particular defendant’s mental capacities by asking whether a defendant who' seeks to conduct his own defense at trial is mentally competent to do so. That is to say the Constitution permits States to insist upon representation by counsel for those competent enough to stand trial under Dusky [v. United States, 36[2] U.S. 402[, 80 S.Ct. 788 , 4 L.Ed.2d 824 ] (1960),] but who still suffer from severe mental illness to the point where they are not competent to conduct trial proceedings by themselves.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.