Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 Ala. App. 383 - Wells v. State

31 Ala. App. 383 - Wells v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 1986
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Turner v. Town of Lineville · 30 Ala. App. 334 - Lovett v. State · Worthington v. City of Jasper · Blankenshire v. State · Bush v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In the County Court, however, no objection was made to the sufficiency of the affidavit; and appellant went to trial on same without protest. In the Circuit Court a complaint was filedโ€”though unnecessaryโ€”which met all the requirements of the law. "The situation here seems not dissimilar, in principle, at least, to that dealt with in the opinion in the case of Turner v. Town of Lineville, 2 Ala.App. 454 , 56 So. 603, 604 , where this court said: `Under the statute governing appeals from judgments of justices of the peace in criminal cases, if no objection to the sufficiency of the affidavit or warrant is raised before the justice, on the trial de novo had on appeal in the circuit or county court, a complaint may be there filed charging the defendant with a criminal offense, though the affidavit and warrant on which the defendant was tried before the justice of the peace did not charge any criminal offense whatever.' And see Worthington v. City of Jasper, 197 Ala. 589 , 73 So. 116 ; and Blankenshire v. State, 70 Ala. 10 . "So we conclude and declare that appellant, by going to trial in the County Court, without objection, on the affidavit above, waived all defects therein. The Attorney General cites, and well he may, our opinion in the case of Bush v. State, 27 Ala.App. 30 , 167 So. 335 , as concluding against the contentions of appellant's able counsel on this appeal on the subject presently discussed. We will not repeat what we there said, but consider same applicable to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.