Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 Ala. App. 545 - Seay v. State

31 Ala. App. 545 - Seay v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1968
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lawson v. State · McLosky v. State · Reid v. State · Henderson v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Ry. Co. · Whitaker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Great latitude is allowed the pronunciation and spelling of proper names, for proper names are often spelled differently but pronounced the same. The correct determination of the oft controversial question of idem sonans may be approached in two ways. If the inquiry arises on demurrers to the plea of misnomer and the names under consideration are pronounced the same, or substantially so, the court will make judicial ascertainment of this fact and hold as a matter of law, the names are the same. If, however, this cannot be determined by the similarity of the pronunciation and the aid of intrinsic evidence must be sought, it becomes a question of fact to be submitted to the court or jury upon issue joined to properly submit the matter.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.