Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

31 Ala. App. 71

12 So.2d 352

Lackey v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1943

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1943-03-02

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 1967

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

Relies on 31 Ala. App. 43 - Rutland v. State · Johnson v. State · 24 Ala. App. 291 - Johnson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1943-03-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SIMPSON, Judge.

¶1 The defendant pleaded guilty to the offense of violating the State prohibition law, and from a judgment and sentence, which he contends was excessive and unwarranted, this appeal was taken. There is no bill of exceptions.

¶2 The punishment was within the limits prescribed by the statute and, from aught we can say, it was justified. The judgment, therefore, must be affirmed. Johnson v. State, 24 Ala.App. 291, 135 So. 592; Rutland v. State, ante, p. 43, 11 So.2d 768.

¶3 Affirmed.

/31/alaapp/71 · .json · Public domain