Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 Backes 336 - Englander v. Jacoby

Englander v. Jacoby’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2008

3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

801942195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York Life Insurance v. Dunlevy · Walter Dunn et al. v. Henry Clarke et al. · Hill v. Henry · Redzina v. Provident Institution for Savings in Jersey City · McVoy v. Baumann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * A party who appears in a cause submits himself to its jurisdiction in respect to those outreaches of the case which are reasonably to be anticipated.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If our New Jersey Circuit Courts had both law and equity jurisdiction, and the suit which is before me were pending in the Essex Circuit Court, the analogy would be complete. But inasmuch as we have separate courts of law and equity, complainant, of necessity, came into Chancery. I do not regard this distinction as vital. When Jacoby applied to the Circuit Court for aid, he submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the judicial department of the state, in respect to the cause of action alleged in his complaint — to the jurisdiction not only of the Circuit Court, but of the Supreme Court, on appeal, and also of the Court of Chancery in the event equitable grounds exist for interfering with the proceeding in the law court. He may be brought into Chancery without personal service of process. Our system of separate tribunals of law and equity does not lessen the power of the state to grant justice. (Italics mine.) *Page 334 "Defendant's motion to vacate will be denied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Defendant's motion to vacate will be denied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.