Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

31 Backes 85

26 A.2d 794

In Re Flynn

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · decided 1942-06-25

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1942-06-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1994

3 state decisions

20194219501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1This is an appeal from an order of the Essex County Orphans Court allowing commissions and a counsel fee to the guardian of a lunatic. The estate is less than $50,000.

¶2Commissions are controlled by R.S. 3:11-1 and 2. Section 1 requires that allowance of commissions to executors, administrators, guardians and trustees should be made with reference to their actual pains, trouble and risk rather than thequantum of the estate. Before 1939, R.S. 3:11-2 to 4 directed that the commissions "shall not exceed" certain percentages. By amendment, P.L. 1939 p. 456, these three sections were combined in one, designated R.S. 3:11-2, which provides that commissions "shall be computed upon the following rates:" On income five per cent.; "On corpus where the corpus receipts do not exceed $50,000, seven per centum on the first $1,000 thereof," c. "Where the corpus receipts exceed $50,000, the court … shall determine the corpus commissions … according to the actual services rendered and the commissions oncorpus shall not exceed five per centum on all corpus." A further amendment, P.L.*861940 p. 530, increased the percentages applicable to small estates.

¶3In spite of the broad language of R.S. 3:11-1, it is evident that commissions on income do not depend upon anything except the amount of income, for the fiduciary is permitted to take his commissions without waiting for allowance thereof by the court. It seems to me likewise true that corpus commissions where thecorpus does not exceed $50,000, must be calculated according to the percentages stated in the statute, without regard to R.S.3:11-1. Compare the direction that commissions "shall be computed upon the following rates," with the former phrase "shall not exceed the following rates." This interpretation of the statute is supported by the provision that where the estate is larger than $50,000, corpus commissions shall be determined "according to the actual services rendered" and "shall not exceed five per centum."

¶4The Orphans Court correctly took the view that it had no discretion with reference to the amount of commissions of the guardian.

¶5When the fiduciary is a lawyer and performs professional services in connection with his official duty, R.S. 3:11-8 permits the court to allow him a counsel fee in addition to commissions.

¶6The proofs show legal services rendered by the guardian for which a just fee would be $300. Let the decree of the Orphans Court be modified accordingly. *87

/31/backes/85 · .json · Public domain