Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 CAL 211 - James v. Williams

James v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1866

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
5
states following
April 1945
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 1945

13 state decisions

30186618701880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hidden v. Jordan · Lyons v. Leimback

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The opinion of the judge who tried the cause, stating the evidence or his analysis of it, or some portion of either, coupled with the reasons for his rulings, is always valuable.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.