Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 CALAPP2D 482 - DeTray v. Higgins

DeTray v. Higgins’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
December 1976
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 1976

22 state decisions

10019391940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnstone v. Morris · Clopton v. Clopton · Shunken v. Cohen · Estate of Wempe · Stanwood v. Carson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A promissory note is presumed to have been given for a sufficient consideration under section 1614 of the Civil Code and in an action thereon, the introduction of the note in evidence establishes a prima facie right to recover according to its terms. The burden of showing a want of consideration, under section 1615 of that code, is cast upon the party seeking to avoid it, and if he fails to make this showing, the presumption prevails and furnishes sufficient evidence to support a finding that the note was given for a good and valuable consideration.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.