Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 Cal. App. 2d 63 - Painter v. Berglund

31 Cal. App. 2d 63 - Painter v. Berglund’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
May 1998
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 1998

14 state decisions

601939194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Frost v. Witter · Northern Trust Co. v. Consolidated Elevator Co. · Forsythe v. Los Angeles Ry. Co. · Curtin v. Kowalsky · Burnham v. National Surety Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[r]emedy' is not redress or relief, but is the means by which a wrong is redressed and relief obtained. A writ is an order in writing issued by a competent official in a judicial proceeding and, as applied to execution in civil cases, is part of the remedy to effectuate the action by the enforcement of the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a process in an action to carry into effect the directions in a decree or judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.