31 Colo. App. 518 - Waggoner v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
2 district · 50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably Giles v. State (1977), Winterwerp v. Allstate Insurance (1976)
2 district · 50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rider v. Lynch · 92 F. Supp. 620 - Aler v. Travelers Indemnity Co. · 128 F. Supp. 67 - Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Marr · Jennings v. Brotherhood Accident Co. · UNITED FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. Perez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * *. Notwithstanding the provision of C.R.S.1963, 13-6-8, that no purchaser `shall acquire any right, title or interest in and to a motor vehicle purchased by him unless and until he shall obtain . . . the certificate of title thereto,' non-delivery of the certificate of title does not prevent change of ownership as between the parties to the transaction. * * *."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The purpose of a nonownership clause, such as the one in question, is to provide the insured with coverage while the insured is engaged in the occasional or infrequent use of an automobile other than the one specified in the policy, but not to provide liability coverage in regard to unspecified automobiles which are furnished or available for the insured’s frequent or regular use. [Authorities.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the automobile ... `was not used by [the insured] more than two or three times' in the four month interval between the sale and the accident in which plaintiff was injured.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.