Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 Conn. App. 178 - State v. Leonard

31 Conn. App. 178 - State v. Leonard’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
1
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

2 district · 81 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently July 2010 · most notably State v. Harris (1993), State v. Betances (2003)

2 district · 81 state decisions

640199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Mendenhall · United States v. Cortez · United States v. Sokolow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] deficiency in one [factor, however] may be compensated for, in determining the overall reliability of a tip, by a strong showing as to the other, or by some other indicia of reliability such as corroboration by the police. . . . The police, however, are not required to corroborate all of the information provided by a confidential informant. . . . Partial corroboration may suffice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““(b) Nothing in sections . . . 1-19 to l-19b, inclusive . . . shall be construed to require disclosure of . . . (2) personnel or medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute an invasion of personal privacy . . . ."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “under State v. Asherman, . . . inquiry could not be made into the mental processes of the jurors, but could explore the use . . . and whether it played any part in the jury's decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.