Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 CONNAPP 761 - Castro v. Castro

Castro v. Castro’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
2
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Roberts v. Roberts (1993), Amodio v. Amodio (2000)

54 state decisions

300199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Billington v. Billington · Jucker v. Jucker · 9 Conn. App. 240 - Niles v. Niles · Rowan Construction Corp. v. Hassane · Martone v. Martone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] civil contempt is one in which the conduct constituting the contempt is directed against some civil right of an opposing party . . . .”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the opportunity to contest his ability to pay such fees.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “. . .In all such determinations there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the amount of such awards which resulted from the application of such guidelines is the amount of support or payment on any arrearage or past due support to be ordered. A specific finding on the record that the application of the guidelines would be inequitable or inappropriate in a particular case, as determined under criteria established by commission under § 46b-215a , shall be sufficient to rebut the presumption in such case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.