Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 Del. Ch. 41 - Staats v. Hubbard

31 Del. Ch. 41 - Staats v. Hubbard’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
April 1980
most recently cited

2 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 1980

2 district · 15 state decisions

10019491950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whitman v. Forney · Steed v. Kimbrough · Adams v. Walker · 118 N.J. Eq. 390 - Nathanson v. Wagner · 153 Pa. Super. 28 - Lare v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It seems to me that in situations such as the one presented by this complaint the test of reasonable user should be applied.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “practical adjustment of conflicting interests”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.